Please don't misunderstand; I am absolutely thrilled that Capt. Chesley B. Sullenberger III was able to save every soul on board his US Airways plane two days ago when geese flew into not one, but two of its jet engines and caused him to ditch it in the Hudson River. And I have nothing but admiration for him, his flight crew and all the first-responders who managed to get all 155 people off the plane and safely ashore as it sank into what must have been sub-freezing, strong-current waters (as I have reason to know, having been a NYC resident through seven winters myself).
But the so-called "miracle" of Thursday's controlled crash was only miraculous in that the passengers and crew were lucky beyond belief that Capt. Sullenberger was assigned to be at the controls, instead of some younger, less seasoned pilot. The rest was skill and experience on the captain's part in getting that aircraft to a safe aquatic landing.
They were also lucky that Congress raised the minimum retirement age for pilots last year by five years, from 60 to 65, and that this happened when it did and not three years from now, or Sullenberger might not have been flying that day at all. This story from Mother Jones magazine's website reports on why he and many other older pilots are still in the air by necessity of their employer's disgraceful financial malfeasance. US Airways needs to recognize that letting this courageous and still-sharp professional suffer for their mismanagement of their pilot pension plan would be a PR disaster of the highest order for them...not to mention a scandal to the jaybirds (whom we should hope LaGuardia Airport does a better job henceforth of keeping out of their flight paths).
But the so-called "miracle" of Thursday's controlled crash was only miraculous in that the passengers and crew were lucky beyond belief that Capt. Sullenberger was assigned to be at the controls, instead of some younger, less seasoned pilot. The rest was skill and experience on the captain's part in getting that aircraft to a safe aquatic landing.
They were also lucky that Congress raised the minimum retirement age for pilots last year by five years, from 60 to 65, and that this happened when it did and not three years from now, or Sullenberger might not have been flying that day at all. This story from Mother Jones magazine's website reports on why he and many other older pilots are still in the air by necessity of their employer's disgraceful financial malfeasance. US Airways needs to recognize that letting this courageous and still-sharp professional suffer for their mismanagement of their pilot pension plan would be a PR disaster of the highest order for them...not to mention a scandal to the jaybirds (whom we should hope LaGuardia Airport does a better job henceforth of keeping out of their flight paths).
no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 09:24 pm (UTC)My dad is 70 & he's still piloting. As long as they aren't going to have a heart attack and drop out of the sky, they can still see the instrument panels and can keep up with the changing tech... I'll take experience for the win.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 09:39 pm (UTC)Anyway, the city where he lives, Danville, is in the SF Bay Area. Yay for the local guy! Fwiw, that city is one of the more affluent around here. So while the mishandled pension issue is still disgraceful, I think he and his family are doing rather better than "getting by."
no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 10:03 pm (UTC)And remember what I said in the toast. This was no miracle. This is a measure of the fact that American ATP's (and flight attendants) get the snot trained out of'em before they're ever allowed aboard the real thing. The luck was that the Hudson is shallow there, and that he managed to snag himself a fat sandbar... but still. You fly like you train, and when the goose hit the fan, the training kicked in.
But, no. There may be some squeaky wheels that would like to hang it up but can't because US Despair screwed their financial pooch. But frankly? (a), Sully ain't one of'em, and (b) if I knew it? I wouldn't fly with'em.
As for bird control.... ha ha ha ha ha ha. Even if there were methods to keep'em under control? they wouldn't be allowed; birds are more important to the environment than planeloads of people, you know. (/sarcasm) I think the fact that while the engines executed the HCF instruction they didn't throw fan blades into the cabin, and that the controls didn't freeze up with out engine power, *and* that there haven't been more such instances in places that ought to be even bigger bird havens, like, say, LAX? San Francisco? is a testament to just how well we're doing.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-17 11:12 pm (UTC)