thatcrazycajun: Image of Matt with a rainbow facemask on (Democrat)
[personal profile] thatcrazycajun
Tonight, Democratic Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (IL) used some of those great heaping gobs of campaign cash he's been collecting to buy half an hour of time on seven television networks for an "infomercial" to boost his campaign as it hits the home stretch. (One of the networks running it was Fox; how on God's green and pleasant Earth did they get that network's notoriously conservative Republican-backing owner, Rupert Murdoch, to allow this?) In case you missed it, CrooksAndLiars.com has been kind enough to link to an online copy of the video in its entirety here.

He could have (and, in Your Humble Correspondent's view, should have) used the time to debunk the ever-growing pile of lies, half-truths and distortions about his past, his policies, his beliefs and his record in office being spewed daily by his desperate, down-by-double-digits opponents, Sen. John McCain (AZ) and Gov. Sarah Palin (AK), and their allies in the Republican Party and elsewhere on the right. He could have decided to fight fire with fire and go on the attack, using the many perfectly legitimate criticisms that can be leveled at the two GOP nominees.

But perhaps knowing that his poll standings and fundraising progress, and McCain's floundering, mean he can afford to, he took the high road. Unlike the opposition, which is spending almost all its time these days telling you why you shouldn't vote for Obama instead of why you should vote for them, Obama chose to use his very expensive 30 minutes to reintroduce himself to America, saying who he is, why he's running and what he plans to do if elected, using as a framing device the stories of several ordinary American families whose lives, incomes and health are suffering under the reign of Mad King George and his minions. And it may well be far more effective in refuting the false portrait his opponents are trying to paint of him than any direct, aggressive refutation would have been.

It wasn't a pre-election Presidential address, as McCain tried to cast it in a speech today ("He's measuring the drapes and writing his first address to the nation already!"), but a classy, eloquent closing argument for his candidacy that only briefly and obliquely touched on "eight years of failed policies." And it closed with a live seven-minute segment from Florida, where Obama asked a crowd on site and the viewers at home to "make a few calls for me, knock on a few doors for me" and "stand with me" to "change this world."

In the old days, before Ronald Reagan and his cronies managed to eliminate that pesky "equal time" rule, such an extravaganza would have obligated the networks running it to give McCain the same half-hour's worth of time for his own message. But as it is, the best he could do was a 30-second ad in the beginning of the World Series game that followed the Obama show, harping yet again on the spurious charges that Obama wants to raise taxes and that "he's not ready." I never thought the day would come that I'd actually find myself glad that the old rules no longer apply.

He hit this one out of the park, folks. Let's all hope and pray he can do the same this coming Tuesday.

Date: 2008-10-30 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mshollie.livejournal.com
He had me at the rolling field of wheat. :)

Date: 2008-10-30 01:27 am (UTC)
ext_2233: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
From: [identity profile] mamadeb.livejournal.com
Not "not ready." Not ready *yet*.

Which is very odd. Because it almost feels like an endorsement. "He'd be good with a tad more seasoning."

Law Correction

Date: 2008-10-30 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osewalrus.livejournal.com
n the old days, before Ronald Reagan and his cronies managed to eliminate that pesky "equal time" rule, such an extravaganza would have obligated the networks running it to give McCain the same half-hour's worth of time for his own message.

No, and the equal time rule still exists, because it is mandated by Section 312 and 315 of the Communications Act. Each network is required to give McCain the same opportunity to buy an ad at the same rate and on the same terms. Trust me, we at MAP have litigated the equal access provisions every election cycle. Every election cycle, some broadcaster thinks it has a way to beat the equal access provisions. They don't.

What Mark Fowler (Reagan's FCC Chair) eliminated was the fairness doctrine.

Edited Date: 2008-10-30 02:56 am (UTC)

Re: Law Correction

Date: 2008-10-30 04:01 am (UTC)
ext_18496: Me at work circa 2007 (Default)
From: [identity profile] thatcrazycajun.livejournal.com
Thank you for chiming in as one in a position to know the relevant law and history. Would you mind explaining exactly what the difference is between the "equal time" clauses you cite and the "fairness doctrine" that Fowler eliminated, for us layfolk? I had always understood these to be one and the same.

Re: Law Correction

Date: 2008-10-30 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osewalrus.livejournal.com
The fairness doctrine had several components, but among these was that a broadcaster had a responsibility to give equal time to opposing points of view. If someone said "nuclear power is safe," then the broadcast had to give an opportunity for someone else to come in and say why they thought it wasn't. This idea included two specific rules, the personal attack rule and the political editorial rule.

The Fowler FCC eliminated this "equal time" obligation, finding that it had caused broadcasters to avoid covering controversial issues and that the market would ensure adequate coverage of opposing views. Many have argued the growth of conservative talk radio was a direct result of this appeal (I'm not entirely convinced myself). For reasons you can read in this old blog post of mine, the political editorial rule and personal attack rule were not eliminated until 2000.

Date: 2008-10-30 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msminlr.livejournal.com
"how on God's green and pleasant Earth did they get that network's notoriously conservative Republican-backing owner, Rupert Murdoch, to allow this?"

Lots of Uncle Sam's green and pleasant money.

Date: 2008-10-30 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osewalrus.livejournal.com
They are required by law to engage in good faith negotiations with regard to length and placement of ads.
http://www.techlawjournal.com/election/19990907ads.htm

Date: 2008-10-31 02:26 am (UTC)
ext_18496: Me at work circa 2007 (Default)
From: [identity profile] thatcrazycajun.livejournal.com
So they have to sell time to *anyone* who wants to run a political ad, even if it's someone whose views their leadership loathes? I bet that just stuck in ol' Rupe's craw something fierce... Hee, hee!
Edited Date: 2008-10-31 02:26 am (UTC)

Date: 2008-10-31 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osewalrus.livejournal.com
That's the whole idea of the statute (47 USC 315). No more kings!

Date: 2008-10-30 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sodyera.livejournal.com
Rather than sit through more of the same I watched "Tin Man" on DVD.

Date: 2008-10-30 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sffilk.livejournal.com
I ended up watching last Tuesday night's episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, which I had taped. I loves mah Law & Aw-duh!

February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 13th, 2026 04:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios