As if her mulish insistence on continuing her increasingly quixotic race for her party's Presidential nomination weren't proof enough that Hillary Rodham Clinton truly cares about no one and nothing save herself (and possibly her family), her latest quoted public statements prove it beyond the merest shadow of a doubt. Scroll down to the money quote in paragraph 16 to find out what has me and half my f-list gaping in sheer, stunned disgust.
So apparently desperate has Clinton become that she is willing to pull out the race card more nakedly than any politician of either major party since Junior's daddy and his late buddy Lee Atwater made Willie Horton a household name. Has it truly escaped her that the Americans she is clearly naming by omission as not being "hard-working" (i.e., non-Caucasians) make up more than half the country's population...and thus, the electorate? And how many times have I said that nominating this woman is tantamount to giving the GOP the White House again, on the proverbial silver platter?
This kind of oh-no-she-didn't statement is sure to send even more voters into the arms of her Illinoisan Senate colleague Barack Obama during the eight primaries remaining in the schedule, not to mention those notoriously uncommitted "superdelegates." And should she by some miracle or skullduggery (three guesses which one's more likely, and the first two don't count) wrest the prize from Obama, do you think for one single solitary picosecond that John McCain and company will hesitate to use this against her in the general election campaign? I sure as hell don't.
Mrs. Clinton, let me add my voice to the growing chorus demanding that you brew yourself a nice cup of sit-down-and-shut-the-fuck-up and withdraw now, while doing so can still save the party and the election.
So apparently desperate has Clinton become that she is willing to pull out the race card more nakedly than any politician of either major party since Junior's daddy and his late buddy Lee Atwater made Willie Horton a household name. Has it truly escaped her that the Americans she is clearly naming by omission as not being "hard-working" (i.e., non-Caucasians) make up more than half the country's population...and thus, the electorate? And how many times have I said that nominating this woman is tantamount to giving the GOP the White House again, on the proverbial silver platter?
This kind of oh-no-she-didn't statement is sure to send even more voters into the arms of her Illinoisan Senate colleague Barack Obama during the eight primaries remaining in the schedule, not to mention those notoriously uncommitted "superdelegates." And should she by some miracle or skullduggery (three guesses which one's more likely, and the first two don't count) wrest the prize from Obama, do you think for one single solitary picosecond that John McCain and company will hesitate to use this against her in the general election campaign? I sure as hell don't.
Mrs. Clinton, let me add my voice to the growing chorus demanding that you brew yourself a nice cup of sit-down-and-shut-the-fuck-up and withdraw now, while doing so can still save the party and the election.
Uh Matt
Date: 2008-05-08 10:30 pm (UTC)Huh?!
Date: 2008-05-08 10:31 pm (UTC)Re: Huh?!
Date: 2008-05-08 10:40 pm (UTC)The divider on the comments wasn't clear.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 10:38 pm (UTC)No, no, no. Hemlock. Seppuku is the only proper exit here.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 11:47 pm (UTC)She wants to get elected.
He wants to be President.
But what do I know? I'm only 28, and the only Presidential elections I've ever voted in were the most recent two...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 12:15 am (UTC)But of course I've had fortymumble years to grow cynical....
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 07:03 pm (UTC)He wants to be President."
OOO, well said!
What you said...
Date: 2008-05-09 01:44 am (UTC)Amen, brother!!!
I'll let my icon speak my opinion of Mrs. C.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 02:28 am (UTC)Sheesh.
(I make it #20.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 02:35 am (UTC)In an interview with USA Today published Thursday, Clinton said, "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on." She cited an Associated Press article "that found how Senator Obama's support among working, hardworking Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me. There's a pattern emerging here," she said. (Emphasis mine.)
But the one you cite is pretty damning, too; apparently Mrs. C. thinks none of us currently in the party are hard-working at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 10:59 pm (UTC)Not to mention that every flippin' bit of mud EITHER CANDIDATE flings at the other is going to come back at election time to bite them, either as a slur on them or as an example of what nastiness they're capable of. Remember; the whole point of this routine is not to prove who's the least rotten candidate. It's to pick one who can beat McCain!