Terry Teachout has an excellent piece in the Wall Street Journal here about why getting older means no longer having to say, "But I gotta have that Bang & Olufsen stereo with the sub-woofer and sixteen different speakers to really listen to music!" I've been in that boat for years, even before I started getting middle-aged, due to a hearing loss sustained since my mid-teens that causes me not to hear as much in certain registers as "normal" hearing allows. (
scruffycritter, bless his generous heart, gave me his old digital hearing aids to help with this a year or so ago, and I'd be wearing them now if I could find a clinic that had the damn expensive/old software to reprogram them.)
For this reason, I never felt bothered terribly by the loss of sound quality MP3/MP4 compression creates that seems to so irk old-school audiophiles. I don't hear any appreciable difference in sound quality listening to my old favorite 1980s dance tunes on my Mac, my Dell laptop or my iPod shuffle from when I previously heard them on older media; and if I do, usually all it takes to resolve the problem is tweaking the equalizer controls in my player software a bit. I usually listen on headphones rather than speakers anyhow, for the improvement in sound reception that comes from my ears not having to fight half a dozen other elements of the ambient noise to hear the music from across the room.
Concerts are not often a problem either, if only because they usually feature big honkin' speaker stacks right up front that blast the sound out so loud even I can hear all the words. (I had to leave a concert at Dragon*Con a couple months back when the speaker stacks in the main concert room at the Hyatt actually began hurting my ears from all the way in the back; when it's so loud even I have to leave, you got a problem, Jack.)
Besides, I gladly trade the extra quality of sound you allegedly get from audio tape, vinyl or CDs for the convenience of being able to go directly to tracks I like and shift them around...and escaping the frustration of having a tape player chew up a favorite cassette's guts every so often, or an accidentally-jarred needle gouge a trench in a treasured vinyl disc. And as Teachout points out, money that isn't spent on high-falutin sound gear is money that can be spent on other, more important things...like, oh, say, buying the music itself.
For this reason, I never felt bothered terribly by the loss of sound quality MP3/MP4 compression creates that seems to so irk old-school audiophiles. I don't hear any appreciable difference in sound quality listening to my old favorite 1980s dance tunes on my Mac, my Dell laptop or my iPod shuffle from when I previously heard them on older media; and if I do, usually all it takes to resolve the problem is tweaking the equalizer controls in my player software a bit. I usually listen on headphones rather than speakers anyhow, for the improvement in sound reception that comes from my ears not having to fight half a dozen other elements of the ambient noise to hear the music from across the room.
Concerts are not often a problem either, if only because they usually feature big honkin' speaker stacks right up front that blast the sound out so loud even I can hear all the words. (I had to leave a concert at Dragon*Con a couple months back when the speaker stacks in the main concert room at the Hyatt actually began hurting my ears from all the way in the back; when it's so loud even I have to leave, you got a problem, Jack.)
Besides, I gladly trade the extra quality of sound you allegedly get from audio tape, vinyl or CDs for the convenience of being able to go directly to tracks I like and shift them around...and escaping the frustration of having a tape player chew up a favorite cassette's guts every so often, or an accidentally-jarred needle gouge a trench in a treasured vinyl disc. And as Teachout points out, money that isn't spent on high-falutin sound gear is money that can be spent on other, more important things...like, oh, say, buying the music itself.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:48 pm (UTC)Each year, I have seen the major companies touting better systems, with pureror sound.
And each year I remember that the human ear can only hear twenty to twenty-thousand
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 07:43 pm (UTC)They really aren't that old. Current Widex software should handle it. I want to say they were brand new in October of 2003. I can check my LJ. I wouldnt be surprised if Widex still sold them to this day.
I'm sure my audiologist can reprogram them. He did it for someone I gave the set I had 3 years *before* those, about the same time I gave you those.
If youre coming up for Darkover, please let me know. I'm sure the two of you can work something out.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 07:59 pm (UTC)And sadly, it looks like I won't be doing Darkover this year, for the first time in over a decade; the car picked yesterday to start acting up, and my neighborhood
bunco artistsrepair shop wants $370 to fix it. Which eats up pretty much all my disposable income for this month in one fell swoop.no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:57 am (UTC)I know my ears are pretty bad; last time I had my hearing checked I was rolling off about 3dB/octave at 6KHz.
Now hear this
Date: 2007-11-16 05:16 am (UTC)I've always been careful of my hearing, stuffing small pieces of cotton or paper towel in my ears when I work a saw or router, and even when I'm at a concert. (If it's so loud that your ears hurt, then it's loud enough to be heard well through the plugs.) I know I can't hear sounds from a distance as I used, but I can still hear the high pitch tone when you turn on the TV, whereas. nobody else I've asked except my kids can. And I can still pick out a conversation in a crowd when the people talking think they're speaking softly enough to blend in.